SB2025082013 - Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Tivoli Netcool Configuration Manager
Published: August 20, 2025
Breakdown by Severity
- Low
- Medium
- High
- Critical
Description
This security bulletin contains information about 6 secuirty vulnerabilities.
1) Interpretation Conflict (CVE-ID: CVE-2024-56339)
The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to gain access to potentially sensitive information.
The vulnerability exists due to excessive data output by the application. A remote attacker can bypass security restrictions caused by a failure to honor security configuration.
2) Stack-based buffer overflow (CVE-ID: CVE-2025-36097)
The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform a denial of service attack.
The vulnerability exists due to a stack-based overflow. A remote unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted request that cause the server to consume excessive memory resources.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may result in complete compromise of vulnerable system.
3) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CVE-ID: CVE-2024-43204)
The disclosed vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform SSRF attacks.
The vulnerability exists due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input in mod_proxy . A remote attacker can send a specially crafted HTTP request and trick the application to initiate requests to arbitrary systems.
Note, the vulnerability exploitation requires an unlikely configuration where mod_headers is configured to modify the Content-Type request or response header with a value provided in the HTTP request.
4) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CVE-ID: CVE-2024-43394)
The disclosed vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform SSRF attacks.
The vulnerability exists due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input when handling UNC paths on Windows. A remote attacker can trick the application into initiating requests to arbitrary systems and potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via mod_rewrite or apache expressions that pass unvalidated request input.
Note, the vulnerability affects Windows installations only.
5) HTTP response splitting (CVE-ID: CVE-2024-42516)
The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform HTTP splitting attacks.
The vulnerability exists due to software does not correctly process CRLF character sequences. A remote attacker with ability to manipulate the Content-Type response headers of applications hosted or proxied by the server can send specially crafted request containing CRLF sequence and make the application to send a split HTTP response.
Successful exploitation of the vulnerability may allow an attacker perform cache poisoning attack.
Note, this vulnerability exists due a missing fix for #VU88151 (CVE-2023-38709).
6) HTTP response splitting (CVE-ID: CVE-2023-38709)
The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform HTTP splitting attacks.
The vulnerability exists due to software does not correctly process CRLF character sequences. A malicious or exploitable backend/content generators can send specially crafted response containing CRLF sequence and make the application to send a split HTTP response.
Successful exploitation of the vulnerability may allow an attacker perform cache poisoning attack.
Remediation
Install update from vendor's website.